Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.
Solomon, Scott D; McMurray, John J V; Anand, Inder S; Ge, Junbo; Lam, Carolyn S P; Maggioni, Aldo P; Martinez, Felipe; Packer, Milton; Pfeffer, Marc A; Pieske, Burkert; Redfield, Margaret M; Rouleau, Jean L; van Veldhuisen, Dirk J; Zannad, Faiez; Zile, Michael R; Desai, Akshay S; Claggett, Brian; Jhund, Pardeep S; Boytsov, Sergey A; Comin-Colet, Josep; Cleland, John; Düngen, Hans-Dirk; Goncalvesova, Eva; Katova, Tzvetana; Kerr Saraiva, Jose F; Lelonek, Małgorzata; Merkely, Bela [Merkely, Béla Péter (Kardiológia), author] Cardiovascular Center (SU
/ FM / C); Department of Cardiology – Heart and Vascular C... (SU / FM / C); Faculty
of Sports Medicine (SU / FM / C); Senni, Michele; Shah, Sanjiv J; Zhou, Jingmin; Rizkala, Adel R; Gong, Jianjian; Shi, Victor C; Lefkowitz, Martin P; PARAGON-HF Investigators and Committees [Collaborative Organization]
The angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril-valsartan led to a reduced
risk of hospitalization for heart failure or death from cardiovascular causes among
patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. The effect of angiotensin
receptor-neprilysin inhibition in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection
fraction is unclear.We randomly assigned 4822 patients with New York Heart Association
(NYHA) class II to IV heart failure, ejection fraction of 45% or higher, elevated
level of natriuretic peptides, and structural heart disease to receive sacubitril-valsartan
(target dose, 97 mg of sacubitril with 103 mg of valsartan twice daily) or valsartan
(target dose, 160 mg twice daily). The primary outcome was a composite of total hospitalizations
for heart failure and death from cardiovascular causes. Primary outcome components,
secondary outcomes (including NYHA class change, worsening renal function, and change
in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire [KCCQ] clinical summary score [scale,
0 to 100, with higher scores indicating fewer symptoms and physical limitations]),
and safety were also assessed.There were 894 primary events in 526 patients in the
sacubitril-valsartan group and 1009 primary events in 557 patients in the valsartan
group (rate ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 1.01; P = 0.06). The
incidence of death from cardiovascular causes was 8.5% in the sacubitril-valsartan
group and 8.9% in the valsartan group (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.16);
there were 690 and 797 total hospitalizations for heart failure, respectively (rate
ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.00). NYHA class improved in 15.0% of the patients in
the sacubitril-valsartan group and in 12.6% of those in the valsartan group (odds
ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.86); renal function worsened in 1.4% and 2.7%, respectively
(hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.77). The mean change in the KCCQ clinical summary
score at 8 months was 1.0 point (95% CI, 0.0 to 2.1) higher in the sacubitril-valsartan
group. Patients in the sacubitril-valsartan group had a higher incidence of hypotension
and angioedema and a lower incidence of hyperkalemia. Among 12 prespecified subgroups,
there was suggestion of heterogeneity with possible benefit with sacubitril-valsartan
in patients with lower ejection fraction and in women.Sacubitril-valsartan did not
result in a significantly lower rate of total hospitalizations for heart failure and
death from cardiovascular causes among patients with heart failure and an ejection
fraction of 45% or higher. (Funded by Novartis; PARAGON-HF ClinicalTrials.gov number,
NCT01920711.).